Home | About Us | What's New | Data Briefs | Our Funders | Help
The Child & Youth Indicators Databank: All you need to know, always up to date.  
Enter keyword(s)
Advanced Search
 


Victims of Hate Speech
View as PDF (Best for Printing)

Headline

Hate speech directed at teens declined slightly between 1999 and 2005, from 13 percent to 11 percent. (See Table 1)

Importance

For students, there can be many negative consequences of being a victim of hate-related words. Hate speech, for this indicator, refers to "a derogatory or bad name' concerning 'race, religion, Hispanic origin, disability, gender, or sexual orientation." It can affect students' performance in school. Victims are more likely to express fear of violence traveling to and from school and at school, which can lead to avoidance of school, classes and extracurricular activities.1 They may also feel anger, personal hurt and betrayal, and/or a sense of powerlessness and isolation.2 Targets of peer harassment (which may include hate speech) experience loneliness, depression and low self-worth.3,4 There are also data to suggest that victims of peer harassment tend to blame themselves for their victim status.5

Students (ages 12-18) who reported having been a target of hate speech were 1.5 times more likely than other students to report being nonviolently victimized and 3.1 times more likely to report being violently victimized while at school.6

Studies have shown that most hate crimes are committed by young males in their late teens and early twenties.7 This is of particular concern since hate-related words can lead to hate crimes.

Trends

The total percentage of students ages 12 to 18 who reported being targets of hate-related words at school during the previous six months decreased modestly between 1999 and 2005 from 13 percent to 11 percent. A large part of that decrease results from a reduction in the percentage of females who were targets of hate-related words (from 14 percent in 1999 to 11 percent in 2005). (See Table 1)

Students were most likely to report hate-related words targeted at a student's race (5 percent in 2005). Three percent of students reported being targeted based on their ethnicity, and between 1 and 2 percent of students reported being targeted for religion, disability, gender or sexual orientation. (See Table 1)

> Back to Top

Differences by Gender

While the overall percentage of students reporting being victims of hate speech is not significantly different for males and females, females were more likely to report being targets of hate-related words based on gender discrimination than were males (3 percent compared with 1 percent, in 2005). However, males were more likely to report being targets of hate-related words based on race discrimination compared with females (5 percent compared with 4 percent, in 2005). (See Figure 1)

Differences by Race and Ethnicity

In 2005, non-Hispanic black students were more likely than non-Hispanic white and Hispanic students to report being victims of hate-related words (15 percent compared with 10 percent among non-Hispanic white and 11 percent Hispanic students). (See Figure 2)

Much of this difference can be accounted for by the large percentage of non-Hispanic black students who reported being targets of hate-related words regarding their race (7 percent for non-Hispanic black students, in 2005). (See Table 2) A high proportion of Hispanic students also reported being targets of hate-related words based on race or ethnicity (6 percent for both race and ethnicity, in 2005). (See Table 2)

Note: In 2005, students were given the option of identifying themselves as more than one race. For the 2005 report, non-Hispanic students who identified themselves as more than one race (1 percent of all respondents) were included in the other category. Respondents who identified themselves as being of Hispanic origin are classified as Hispanic, regardless of their race.

Differences by Urbanicity

In 2005, children living in urban and rural areas were significantly more likely to be targets of hate speech than children living in suburban areas (12 percent of students living in urban areas and 15 percent of students living in rural areas compared with 9 percent of students living in suburban areas). (See Table 1)

Related Indicators

Unsafe at School

> Back to Top

State and Local Estimates

None available

International Estimates

None available

National Goals

None available

> Back to Top

What Works: Programs that May Influence this Indicator

None available at this time.

Research References

1 U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. "Are America's Schools Safe? Students Speak Out: 1999 School Crime Supplement," (NCES 2002-331), by Lynn A. Addington, Sally A. Ruddy, Amanda K. Miller, and Jill F. DeVoe. Project Officer: Kathryn A. Chandler. Washington DC: 2002. http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2002/2002331.pdf

2 Juvonen, J., Nishina, A., and Graham, S. (2000). "Peer Harassment, Psychological Adjustment, and School Functioning in Early Adolescence." Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 349-359.

3Graham, S. and Juvonen, J. (1998). "Self-blame and Peer Victimization in Middle School: An Attributional Analysis." Developmental Psychology, 34, 587-599.

4Ibid.

5Van Dorn, R. (2002). "Unrecognized Warning Signs." Education Week, 22, 41. Available through edweek.org at http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2002/11/13/11vandorn.h22.html?querystring=Unrecognized%20Warning%20Signs

6Ibid.

7Steinberg, A., Brooks, J. and Remtulla, T. (2003). "Youth Hate Crimes: Identification, Prevention, and Intervention." American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 979-989. http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/reprint/160/5/979

> Back to Top

Definition

For this indicator, a hate-related word is "'a derogatory or bad name' concerning 'race, religion, Hispanic origin, disability, gender, or sexual orientation.' Students were asked if anyone had called them a hate-related word in the last six months."

Data Source

Data from 2005: Dinkes, R., Cataldi, E.F., Kena, G., Baum, K., Baum, K., & Synder, T.D. (2006). Indicators of School Crime and Safety: 2006 (NCES 2007-003/NCJ 214262). U.S. Departments of Education and Justice. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Table 10.2. http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2007/2007003.pdf

Data from 2003: DeVoe, J.F., Peter, K., Kaufman, P., Miller, A., Noonan, M., Snyder, T.D., and Baum, K. (2004). Indicators of School Crime and Safety: 2004 (NCES 2005-002/NCJ 205290). U.S. Departments of Education and Justice. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/iscs04.pdf

Data from 2001: DeVoe, J.F., Peter, K., Kaufman, P., Ruddy, S.A., Miller, A.K., Planty, M., Snyder, T.D., and Rand, M.R. Indicators of School Crime and Safety: 2003. NCES 2004-004/NCJ 201257. U.S. Departments of Education and Justice. Washington, DC: 2003. http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/iscs03.pdf

Data from 1999: Kaufman, P., Chen, X., Choy, S.P., Peter, K., Ruddy, S.A., Miler, A.K., Fleury, J.K., Chandler, K.A., Planty, M.G., and Rand, M.R. Indicators of School Crime and Safety: 2001. U.S. Departments of Education and Justice. NCES 2002. 113/NCJ-190075. Washington, DC: 2001. http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/iscs01.pdf

Raw Data Source

U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, School Crime Supplement to the National Crime Victimization Survey, 1999-2003. http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/cvict.htm#ncvs
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pubalp2.htm#indicators

Approximate Date of Next Update

2007

> Back to Top

 
Back
View as PDF
(Best for Printing)

Index
Importance
Trends &
Subgroup Differences
Related Indicators
State, Local &
International Estimates
National Goals
What Works: Programs that May Influence this Indicator
Research
References
Definition, Data
Sources
& Next Update

Supporting Figures
Figure 1
Figure 2

Supporting Tables
Table 1
Table 2
  Site Design by WebFirst
Subgroup Age Alphabet Indicators with separate estimates by subgroup: race, 
ethnicity, family structure, income, welfare receipt, etc. Age Alphabetically