Home | About Us | What's New | Data Briefs | Our Funders | Help
The Child & Youth Indicators Databank: All you need to know, always up to date.  
Enter keyword(s)
Advanced Search
 


Repeating a Grade
View as PDF (Best for Printing)

Headline

Among children in grades one through three, non-Hispanic blacks are much more likely than other children to have repeated a grade of primary school. In 2003, 10 percent of non-Hispanic black children had repeated a grade, compared with 1 percent of Asian or Pacific Islander children, 4 percent of non-Hispanic white children, and 6 percent of Hispanic children of the same age. (See Figure 2)

Importance

Young children often repeat grades because teachers or parents feel they have not acquired the appropriate academic or social skills to advance to the next grade. Some argue that by spending an extra year, children will have the time to gain the necessary skills needed for success in the next grade. However, much research shows that repeating a grade actually does not benefit children academically or socially.1 Those students who repeated a grade continued to score significantly below other low-scoring peers who had not been held back on standardized tests. One study of children who had repeated second grade found that their performance scores were very similar to those of students in special education. Children who were retained in the first grade were more likely than other students to drop out of school.2

While cause and effect are difficult to untangle, grade retention can also produce more negative socioemotional development. In contrast to matched comparison groups, one study found children who had repeated a grade showed poorer social adjustment, more negative attitudes towards school, more problem behaviors and less frequent attendance, although other studies found fewer significant differences.3 At the same time, others argue against the practice of 'social promotion,' or promoting children just so they can continue on with their peers.4 Other options, such as making sure children with disabilities are receiving special education, early intervention programs, or preschool attendance, should also be explored.5,6

Trends

Between 1993 and 1999, the percentage of first through third graders who had repeated a grade of primary school increased from 5 percent to almost 7 percent, before returning to 5 percent in 2003. (See Figure 1)

While patterns for non-Hispanic white children follow the overall trends, patterns for non-Hispanic black children have been less consistent, with the highest reported percentage since 1993 occurring in 2003. (See Table 1)

Note: Those children who only repeated kindergarten or who delayed the start of kindergarten are excluded from all of these estimates.

> Back to Top

Differences by Race and Ethnicity

Non-Hispanic black children in grades one through three are much more likely than other children to have repeated a grade of primary school. In 2003, 10 percent of non-Hispanic black children had repeated a grade, compared with 1 percent of Asian or Pacific Islander children, 4 percent of non-Hispanic white children, and 6 percent of Hispanic children of the same age. (See Figure 2)

Differences by Parental Education

Children whose parents have more than a high school degree are much less likely than children whose parents have less education to repeat a grade. In 2003, 2 percent of children with a parent who had a bachelor's degree or more and 4 percent of children whose parents completed some college or a technical vocational degree had repeated a grade, compared with 8 percent of children whose parents received a high school degree or equivalent and 10 percent of children whose parents had a high school degree or less. (See Figure 3)

Differences by Neighborhood Poverty

First through third graders living in neighborhoods with higher concentrations of child poverty are more likely than other children to have ever repeated a grade in primary school. Thirteen percent of children living in a neighborhood where 20 percent or more of the children lived in poor households had ever repeated a grade in 2003, compared with 7 percent of children living in a neighborhood with 10 percent to 19 percent of children living in poverty, 5 percent of children living in a neighborhood with 5 to 9 percent in poverty, and 3 percent of children living in a neighborhood with less than 5 percent poverty. (See Figure 4)

Differences by Poverty Level and TANF/AFDC benefits

Children living in a household with an income at or below the poverty level are more likely than those living in a household above the poverty level to have ever repeated a grade (10 percent versus 4 percent, respectively, in 2003). Children receiving TANF in the past year were more than three times as likely as those not receiving TANF to have ever repeated a grade in 2003 (14 percent versus 4 percent, respectively). (See Table 1)

Similar patterns exist for Medicaid and food stamp receipt. In 2003, children receiving Medicaid or food stamps were more likely than other children to have ever repeated a grade. (See Table 1)

Differences by Region

First through third graders living in the South are more likely than first through third graders living in the Midwest and the West to have repeated a grade (8 percent versus 3 percent, respectively, in 2003). (See Table 1) Five percent of children living in the Northeast had repeated a grade.

Related Indicators

High School Dropout, Science Proficiency, Reading Proficiency, Writing Proficiency, Mathematics Proficiency,

> Back to Top

State and Local Estimates

2003 state estimates for the percentage of children who have repeated a grade since starting kindergarten (not since first grade as in this indicator) are available through the National Survey for Children's Health at http://nschdata.org/dataquery/surveyareas.aspx. (Select Community and School Activities under Child Health Measures)

International Estimates

None available

National Goals

None known

> Back to Top

What Works: Programs and Interventions that May Influence this Indicator

Click here to view examples of programs and interventions that research has evaluated for this indicator. View programs

Research References

1Jimerson, Shane R., Kaufman, Amber M. (2003). "Reading, writing, and retention: A primer on grade retention research." 00340561. Reading Teacher, 56(7).

2Randolph, Karen, Fraser, Mark, and Orthner, Dennis. "Educational Resilience among Youth at Risk". Substance Use & Misuse, 39(5):747-767.

3Jimerson, Shane R. and Kaufman, Amber M. (2003).

4Jimerson, Shane R. and Kaufman, Amber M. (2003).

5U.S. Department of Education. (1999). "Taking Responsibility for Ending Social Promotion: A Guide for Educators and State and Local Leaders." Available at: http://www.ed.gov/pubs/socialpromotion/index.html.

6Reynolds, Arthur J., Temple, Judy A., and Ou, Suh-Ruu. (Sep/Oct 2003). "School-Based Early Intervention and Child Well-Being in the Chicago Longitudinal study." Child Welfare, 82(5):633-657.

> Back to Top

Definition

This indicator includes children in first through third grade or the equivalent if they are home-schooled etc.

Parents who answered yes, when asked if their children had repeated any grade since first grade, are included in these estimates.

Data Source

Child Trends' original analyses of data from the National Household Education Survey.

Raw Data Source

National Household Education Survey
http://nces.ed.gov/nhes/

Approximate Date of Next Update

Unknown

> Back to Top

 
Back
View as PDF
(Best for Printing)

Index
Importance
Trends &
Subgroup Differences
Related Indicators
State, Local &
International Estimates
National Goals
What Works: Programs that May Influence this Indicator
Research
References
Definition, Data
Sources
& Next Update

Supporting Figures
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Supporting Tables
Table 1
  Site Design by WebFirst
Subgroup Age Alphabet Indicators with separate estimates by subgroup: race, 
ethnicity, family structure, income, welfare receipt, etc. Age Alphabetically